The "My Child-My Chart Act," or House Bill 162, seeks to give parents unprecedented access to children's medical records. Furthermore, HB 162 unnecessarily complicates parental access to electronic health records and minor’s assent.
This proposed legislation does this in three primary ways:
1: Reaffirm Standards & Separate Records
The bill requires healthcare providers to ensure, to the fullest extent allowed by HIPAA and Ohio law, that a minor's parent or guardian has access to the child's electronic medical records. HB 162 conflicts within itself by distinguishing that records related to care provided without parental consent should be separated from those involving parental or guardian consent.
2: Annual Services Notice & Disclosure Policy
Following which, The My Child-My Chart Act mandates that providers annually inform parents about the laws and services that minors are eligible to receive without parental consent and would require the provider to inform the guardian that records from such circumstances cannot be disclosed to parents without the minor's consent.
3: Annual Minor Assent/Consent to All Records
Despite this acknowledgment, House Bill 162 then requires providers to ask every minor at their annual visit if they wish to provide "general, ongoing written consent" to allow access to records related to care the minor has or may consent to in the future. This “ongoing written consent” would include providing the minor’s guardian access to treatment records from services that did not require parental consent.
Redundancy
Vulnerable Populations/Services
Best Practices & Therapeutic Relationship
Hello,
I am a licensed counselor in (City and State). I urge you to oppose HB 162. This bill is largely redundant, as medical professionals are already required to share medical information with parents regarding their minor children. And the changes would cause increased workload for already overworked medical professionals. Best practice for counselors involves keeping minor information private unless medically necessary in order to maintain therapeutic rapport and HB 162 undermines those ethics.